Lawson Criticizes FIA's Suzuka Qualifying Rule Change as Ineffective

Liam Lawson has dismissed the impact of the FIA's recent energy rule adjustment at the Japanese Grand Prix, stating it "didn't feel like" it made any difference to the qualifying experience. The change, intended to reduce lift-and-coast and super-clipping tactics, was met with frustration as drivers still had to employ significant energy-saving techniques around the iconic Suzuka circuit.

Why it matters:

The FIA's intervention aimed to restore a more traditional, flat-out qualifying lap by limiting the usable energy from 9MJ to 8MJ. Its apparent failure highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing complex power unit regulations with the core spectacle of driver skill and outright speed, a key concern for the sport's entertainment value.

The details:

• The AlphaTauri driver, who has recent experience in Japan's Super Formula series, provided a direct comparison, noting the persistent need for super-clipping—particularly into the high-speed 130R corner.
• Lawson pointed out the difficulty in judging the change, as every track on the calendar currently presents unique challenges with the current generation of cars.
• Super Formula Comparison: Lawson contrasted the F1 experience with driving a Super Formula car at Suzuka, praising the latter's exceptionally high cornering speeds and describing it as a "very fun car to drive," despite its lower horsepower.

Looking ahead:

Lawson's comments, echoing sentiments from other drivers, put pressure on the FIA to re-evaluate its approach. If rule tweaks fail to deliver the intended on-track product, it may necessitate a more fundamental review of the energy management regulations to ensure qualifying remains a true test of ultimate performance.