Latest News

F1 start safety debate exposes team divide

F1 start safety debate exposes team divide

Summary
A clash over F1's new start procedures is brewing, with drivers warning of an imminent big crash due to dangerous speed differences. George Russell hints Ferrari is blocking a fix to a battery rule quirk, putting teams at odds over safety versus competitive advantage under the 2026 regulations.

A technical quirk in Formula 1's 2026 power unit regulations is creating dangerous speed differences at race starts, sparking a safety debate and revealing a split between teams over potential fixes. George Russell suggested Ferrari is blocking a rule change that would ease the issue, while drivers like Max Verstappen and Sergio Perez warn a "massive" start-line crash is inevitable without action.

Why it matters:

The core issue—a battery "harvest limit" that affects cars differently based on their grid position—is creating unpredictable and hazardous launch scenarios. With drivers already reporting near-misses, the debate pits immediate safety concerns against the principle of teams optimizing their designs within long-established rules. This stalemate highlights the challenge of balancing competition with driver protection in a new technical era.

The details:

  • The controversy centers on a rule limiting how much energy (MGU-K) a car can harvest per lap. On the formation lap, cars at the front of the grid begin harvesting before crossing the start/finish line, consuming their limit early. Cars at the back cross the line sooner, resetting their limit and retaining more battery for critical pre-start procedures like tire burnouts.
  • This discrepancy can leave front-row cars with depleted batteries by the time they reach the grid, compromising their launch capability and creating extreme speed differences when the lights go out.
  • The Melbourne Near-Miss: The problem was highlighted in Australia when Franco Colapinto (Alpine) narrowly avoided slamming into the slow-moving Liam Lawson (Racing Bulls) at the start. Both drivers and onlookers like Sergio Perez called it a terrifying preview of a much bigger accident.
  • Ferrari's Stance: According to sources, Ferrari, whose power unit is reportedly well-adapted to the current rules, opposes further changes. The team's position is that the regulations have been fixed for a long time and others should adapt their procedures, not that the rules should accommodate sub-optimal designs.
  • Driver Warnings: Multiple drivers have voiced serious concerns. Max Verstappen called starting with low battery "quite dangerous," while Sergio Perez stated it feels like "just a matter of time before a massive shunt happens."

What's next:

The FIA is reportedly willing to adjust the harvest limit rule but requires a "super majority" vote from the teams, which it currently lacks. Russell implied Ferrari is the holdout. In the short term, teams now aware of the quirk will adjust their procedures to work around it, as Russell noted they would for the Chinese GP. However, the underlying safety concern voiced by much of the grid remains unresolved, setting the stage for continued political tension and calls for change, especially if another close call or incident occurs.

Original Article :https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/mercedes-and-ferrari-row-over-f1-race-starts-...

logoThe Race

F1 COSMOS | F1 start safety debate exposes team divide