
Sacrilege? Our verdict on F1's 2027 calendar and sprint expansion
F1's 2027 calendar announcement carried extra weight given Middle East uncertainty that could disrupt the current season's back end. Bahrain and Saudi Arabia remain for now, but the expansion to 10 sprints — and some venues — has divided opinion.
Why it matters:
The 2027 sprint expansion is F1's boldest commitment yet to the format, raising a fundamental question: do more sprints enhance the spectacle, or dilute a grand prix weekend's value?
The details:
- Season-opening sprint is "sacrilege": Scott Mitchell-Malm argues a sprint at the opening round burns all the anticipation of the first race on a "shallow impersonation of the main event."
- Monaco sprint's hidden appeal: Glenn Freeman balked at first, but warmed up once he realized it means two qualifying sessions in Monaco. He'd even replace the sprint with a third quali session.
- Sprints lack identity: Edd Straw notes that after 29 sprints, few fans would remember specific ones. They remain "disposable, snack-sized versions" of the main event, lacking their own character.
- Jeopardy in Monaco: Jon Noble sees the upside: with just one practice session before qualifying, the weekend gains genuine jeopardy. "The best part of the Monaco GP is qualifying. Next year we are going to get it twice."
The big picture:
The 2027 calendar confirms sprints are here to stay and expanding. The venue debate reveals a deeper tension between entertainment and sporting purity, while Bahrain and Saudi Arabia remain fixtures for now.
What's next:
The Monaco sprint experiment will be one of 2027's most intriguing storylines — whether it produces chaos or a procession, it guarantees twice the qualifying drama on those famous streets.
Original Article :https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/sacrilege-our-verdict-on-2027-f1-calendar-spr...





