Bearman Calls Tsunoda's US GP Defense 'Dangerous' and 'Desperate'

Haas F1 driver Oliver Bearman has launched a scathing critique of Yuki Tsunoda, labeling his defensive move at the US Grand Prix as both 'dangerous' and 'desperate.' The incident, occurring on Lap 35 as Bearman challenged for seventh, saw the Haas driver accuse Tsunoda of a late, reactive block that forced him into evasive action and a spin.

Why it matters:

• This public criticism highlights growing tensions and disagreements over racing etiquette and safety standards on the F1 grid.
• Such incidents, even without penalties, raise questions about driving conduct and the fine line between aggressive defense and dangerous maneuvers, impacting the sport's image and potentially influencing future stewarding decisions.

The Details:

• The Incident: Bearman attempted an overtake on Tsunoda for P7 at Turn 15, moving up the inside. Tsunoda's late defensive move caused Bearman to spin.
• Bearman's Accusation: Bearman stated Tsunoda 'moved in reaction' and 'didn't leave a car's worth of track,' calling the action 'not fair' and 'dangerous.' He suggested it 'could have caused a huge crash without my quick avoidance.'
• Stewards' Decision: Despite Bearman's strong claims, Tsunoda received no penalty for the move, indicating the stewards did not deem it a breach of regulations.
• 'Grey Area': Bearman acknowledged that moving in the braking zone might be a 'grey area of the regulations' but insisted it was 'not fair.'
• Broader Criticism: Bearman extended his criticism beyond the main race incident, pointing to Tsunoda's contact with Isack Hadjar in the sprint race at Turn 1 as further evidence of 'desperate' driving. Bearman noted, "In the sprint race, he sent it up the inside at Turn 1 and took out a sister car. In the main race, he did the same thing in Turn 1 again."

Between the lines:

Bearman's comments underscore a deeper concern about the 'spirit of racing' and the example F1 drivers set for younger generations. His pointed remarks, especially after a non-penalty decision, suggest a frustration with current officiating interpretations or a belief that Tsunoda's driving crosses an ethical, if not always legal, boundary.

What's next:

While no immediate action is expected given the lack of a penalty, Bearman's outspoken critique could contribute to ongoing discussions within the FIA and among drivers regarding acceptable defensive maneuvers and the interpretation of 'moving under braking' rules. This might also add an interesting dynamic between the two drivers in future races.